JBL Stage 260F vs Polk Monitor XT70
The JBL Stage 260F is more sensitive (90 dB vs 89 dB), so it plays louder per watt. The Polk Monitor XT70 plays lower (35 Hz vs 40 Hz), is an easier load for a receiver (8 Ω vs 6 Ω) and costs less ($349 vs $550).
What each one works with
Checked against every product in our catalogue by the same engine as the compatibility checker.
| Stage 260F | Monitor XT70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivers and amps that drive it | 29 of 29 | 29 of 29 |
Specs side by side
Values that differ are bold. A dash means that model doesn't publish the spec.
| Stage 260F | Monitor XT70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 6 Ω | 8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB (2.83 V, 1 m) | 89 dB |
| Low end | 40 Hz | 35 Hz |
| Drivers | 1 × 25 mm, 2 × 165 mm | 1 × 25 mm, 2 × 165 mm, 2 × 203 mm |
| Size | 12×41×14 in | 9×40×13 in |
| Recommended amplifier power | 20–225 W | 25–200 W |
| Weight | 19.5 kg (43 lb) | 15.88 kg (35 lb) |
| MSRP | $550 each (MSRP, September 2026) | $349 each (MSRP, September 2026) |
Every spec and pairing: JBL Stage 260F, Polk Monitor XT70.
Try either one in your own room.
Draw your room in 3D, place it with the rest of your system, and see every connection checked. Designing is free.
References
- JBL Stage 260F: Dimensional drawing, jbl.com, retrieved September 15, 2026
- JBL Stage 260F: Retailer listing, worldwidestereo.com, retrieved September 15, 2026
- Polk Monitor XT70: Spec sheet, denon.com, retrieved September 15, 2026
- Polk Monitor XT70: Manufacturer product page, polkaudio.com, retrieved September 15, 2026
Brand names are trademarks of their owners. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any manufacturer. 3D models are our approximations. Prices are manufacturer list prices (MSRP) as of the month shown. How we earn from buy links: affiliate disclosure.